top of page

Public Statement About The Publication of the Sagittarius A* Exploratory Analysis Documents

  • Writer: Eolisa Space
    Eolisa Space
  • Aug 7
  • 4 min read

AUGUST 2025

ree

Regarding the Absence of Traditional Peer Review in the Recent Scientific Disclosure

Eolisa Space hereby issues this statement to clarify in precise, final, and unequivocal terms its position regarding the decision to publish one of its recent theoretical studies without undergoing the traditional peer review process.


We recognize that this action may raise questions among some academic circles. However, we are not obligated to meet anyone’s expectations of conformity especially when those systems have repeatedly failed to recognize, support, or even engage with independent research institutions like ours.


A Broken System Cannot Be the Sole Gatekeeper of Truth


Over the past several years, Eolisa Space has reached out to hundreds of professors, universities, and research institutions across Türkiye and internationally. Our outreach was persistent, respectful, and well-documented. Yet, the overwhelming majority of those efforts were ignored or dismissed not because of scientific shortcomings, but because Eolisa Space does not affiliate itself with any political bloc, religious group, ideological movement, or entrenched institutional network. We are, and will remain, fiercely independent.


From our earliest days operating with as little as $5,000–$10,000 in institutional funds we survived on resilience, not privilege. We faced gatekeeping not based on merit, but on systemic biases. The unfortunate reality is that in Türkiye, most scientific recognition is not awarded through scientific rigor, but through alignment with existing power structures. Eolisa Space refused to compromise its integrity.


The company holds internal archives of all its correspondence and outreach attempts. Should it be necessary, the individual formerly responsible for leading scientific communications now no longer part of the scientific team may personally release those records. Until then, this statement shall suffice.


Why We Published


We published because we had to. The dissolution of our scientific team, the exhaustion of resources, and the ongoing reallocation of our operational focus left us with one decision: let the work disappear, or preserve it publicly.

We chose preservation.


This study represents months of effort. It is not perfect. It may be challenged. It may even be wrong. But it deserved to be seen. We refuse to wait indefinitely for a bureaucratic stamp of approval from systems that have ignored us. We no longer have the luxury to sit still.

From Theory to Reality: Eolisa Space's New Era


As of this statement, Eolisa Space will no longer prioritize theoretical or scientific publication projects unless a newly formed scientific committee is publicly announced. Instead, all focus and resources will be redirected toward the completion of our four core physical infrastructure projects: the EOLS Academy, EOLS Hub, EOLS Observatory, and the Research Center.

Any future scientific publications, should they emerge, will follow updated protocols under newly defined structures. Until such time, this concludes the scientific phase of our 2023–2025 development era.


Scientific Gatekeeping Has Repeatedly Failed Throughout History


Let it not be forgotten that many of history’s most impactful scientific discoveries were initially ridiculed, dismissed, or blocked by peer reviewers:

  • Alfred Wegener’s continental drift theory was rejected for decades.

  • Ignaz Semmelweis was mocked for promoting handwashing.

  • Gregor Mendel’s genetic laws were ignored until long after his death.

  • Barbara McClintock was doubted for her discovery of transposons until she received the Nobel Prize 30 years later.

  • Enrico Fermi’s work on weak interaction was initially rejected.

  • Hans Krebs’s groundbreaking study on the citric acid cycle was refused by Nature.

  • The Lancet published a fraudulent MMR-autism study by Wakefield that passed peer review demonstrating that the system is neither infallible nor incorruptible.

Peer review is not a religion. It is a tool one that must be questioned, updated, and kept in check. And it is not the only path to truth.


Our Institutional Integrity


Throughout its existence, Eolisa Space has shared its progress, documents, projects, and decisions with the public in a manner that is open, verifiable, and transparent. We have never asked anyone to "trust us blindly."


Despite this, some individuals have chosen to label our institution with absurd accusations including the term "fraud.". This makes us laugh. We ran a Kickstarter campaign, reached our goal, and still canceled it because we determined that the funds we would receive, despite meeting the target, were not enough to deliver what we promised. We could have taken the money, delivered less, and no one would have noticed. But we didn’t. We walked away.

Over the years, we’ve received multiple investment offers. We turned them down. We weren't ready. We didn't want to misrepresent our capacity. That is the level of self-restraint and ethics we maintain.


We never said: "We did this, now give us money." We never asked for donations in exchange for vague promises. We never claimed your money would multiply. All we ever did and continue to do is pursue independent science with the integrity the world seems to have forgotten.

Yes, we've made mistakes. We've miscalculated. But our intent has never wavered.


To Those Still Confused


This is not just about a research paper. It is about the right of independent thinkers to survive in a system designed to crush them. It's about the millions of people who have seen their ideas dismissed because they didn't come from the "right" institution, or didn't carry the "right" endorsement.


We are not alone in this struggle. And we will not apologize for finding a way through it.


Final Words


This statement is both our clarification and our closure. There will be no further response on this matter. We have made our decision, we stand by it, and we move forward.


Eolisa Space is not here to please everyone. We are here because we want to build the future.


Eolisa Space Headquarters

Albuquerque, New Mexico

 
 

Contact Eolisa Space

Reach out to us for any inquiries or assistance. We’re here for you.

Copyright © 2020-2025 Eolisa Space©. All rights reserved.

1209 Mountain Road PL NE #5234

Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 87110

presidency@eolisaspace.com

President’s Office

 

WhatsApp / Direct Contact: +1 (505) 381 8228

(Calls & SMS from the US and Canada)

Science Team

 

WhatsApp / Direct Contact: +1 (438) 701 7290

(Calls & SMS from the US and Canada)

 

Sentinel Alpha

 

WhatsApp / Direct Contact: +1 (438) 701 7206

Email: sentinelalpha@eolisaspace.com

(All inquiries will be answered within 24 hours via email)

bottom of page